Shirt Pocket Discussions  
    Home netTunes launchTunes SuperDuper! Buy Now Support Discussions About Shirt Pocket    

Go Back   Shirt Pocket Discussions > SuperDuper! > General
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-03-2009, 12:49 PM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,923
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
Perhaps a difference in the spotlight indexes in the two drives, Marc (one's inside the TM archive, too)? Could also be that the compression was preserved in the source but not when copied.
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-03-2009, 02:28 PM
nkhester nkhester is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 26
It may not be just SD that is bloating its output with OS X 10.6. Over the past two days I've seen similar inexplicable bloating of Time Machine files.

http://discussions.apple.com/thread....42173&tstart=0
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-03-2009, 03:57 PM
MacCetera MacCetera is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Hartland, WI
Posts: 19
Examining individual TM session differences

Quote:
Originally Posted by nkhester View Post
It may not be just SD that is bloating its output with OS X 10.6. Over the past two days I've seen similar inexplicable bloating of Time Machine files.

http://discussions.apple.com/thread....42173&tstart=0
I've been using BackupLoupe to show the detailed differences in TM snapshots:

http://soma-zone.com/BackupLoupe/

-- Marc
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-04-2009, 10:14 AM
nkhester nkhester is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by nkhester View Post
It may not be just SD that is bloating its output with OS X 10.6. Over the past two days I've seen similar inexplicable bloating of Time Machine files.

http://discussions.apple.com/thread....42173&tstart=0
The explanation (at least, partial) for the bloating of TM is that I found that WD Drive Management is incompatible with OS X 10.6. It was adding a spurious message to Console every 10 seconds whether drives were connected or not. It appears that each entry is unique and is seen by TM as a "change"! This caused TM to bloat by about 10GB daily.

Needless to say I've disabled the WD program without any "visible" effect other than TM is no longer bloating hourly.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-03-2009, 03:51 PM
MacCetera MacCetera is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Hartland, WI
Posts: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by dnanian View Post
Perhaps a difference in the spotlight indexes in the two drives, Marc (one's inside the TM archive, too)? Could also be that the compression was preserved in the source but not when copied.
I have always had Spotlight indexing disabled on the clones. I just checked the exclusion list again, and the TM copy is still listed as excluded. Then I did a du on both the source and target Spotlight dirs:

Code:
root@jupiter
/Volumes/Amalthea $du /Volumes/Amalthea/.Spotlight-V100/
175648	/Volumes/Amalthea/.Spotlight-V100//Store-V1/Stores/BA8038CE-F979-4651-912B-3A0FEF836D6C
175648	/Volumes/Amalthea/.Spotlight-V100//Store-V1/Stores
175664	/Volumes/Amalthea/.Spotlight-V100//Store-V1
175664	/Volumes/Amalthea/.Spotlight-V100/

root@jupiter
/Volumes/Amalthea $du /Volumes/Himalia/.Spotlight-V100/
4102416	/Volumes/Himalia/.Spotlight-V100//Store-V1/Stores/38C02202-C9B6-4154-AAC9-B1A851A00BBE
4102416	/Volumes/Himalia/.Spotlight-V100//Store-V1/Stores
4102432	/Volumes/Himalia/.Spotlight-V100//Store-V1
4102432	/Volumes/Himalia/.Spotlight-V100/
So this does explain part of the 5.42 GB difference, but it's not the whole story.

So why would a copy result in expansion of compressed data?

-- Marc
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-03-2009, 04:47 PM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,923
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
I'm sorry -- I can't take the time to go into detail on this here, since we're still investigating. But I'm going to write a blog post about it when I get a few minutes of free time to discuss the issue and what we did (or are in process of doing) to fix it.

As I recall (and mentioned above), there's a spotlight index inside the TM backups.backupdb too.
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-03-2009, 05:45 PM
MacCetera MacCetera is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Hartland, WI
Posts: 19
Only one .Spotlight set on TM Volumes

Quote:
Originally Posted by dnanian View Post
As I recall (and mentioned above), there's a spotlight index inside the TM backups.backupdb too.
There's only one Spotlight location on Time Machine volumes - and none were found within the Backups.backupdb directory...

Code:
root@jupiter
/Volumes/Amalthea $find /Volumes/Himalia -name .Spotlight-V100
/Volumes/Himalia/.Spotlight-V100
A more general search yields only spotlight-named things that should be in the backup...

Code:
root@jupiter
/Volumes/Amalthea $find /Volumes/Himalia -name *Spotlight*
/Volumes/Himalia/.Spotlight-V100
/Volumes/Himalia/Backups.backupdb/Jupiter/2008-09-22-001142/Europa/Library/Application Support/iDVD/Themes/iDVD 7/CenterStage-Chapters.theme/Contents/Resources/CenterStage-Main-Spotlights.qtz
/Volumes/Himalia/Backups.backupdb/Jupiter/2008-09-22-001142/Europa/Library/Application Support/iDVD/Themes/iDVD 7/CenterStage-Extras.theme/Contents/Resources/CenterStage-Main-Spotlights.qtz
/Volumes/Himalia/Backups.backupdb/Jupiter/2008-09-22-001142/Europa/Library/Application Support/iDVD/Themes/iDVD 7/CenterStage-Main.theme/Contents/Resources/CenterStage-Main-Spotlights.qtz
/Volumes/Himalia/Backups.backupdb/Jupiter/2008-09-22-001142/Europa/Library/Spotlight
/Volumes/Himalia/Backups.backupdb/Jupiter/2008-09-22-001142/Europa/Library/Spotlight/GBSpotlightImporter.mdimporter
/Volumes/Himalia/Backups.backupdb/Jupiter/2008-09-22-001142/Europa/Library/Spotlight/GBSpotlightImporter.mdimporter/Contents/MacOS/GBSpotlightImporter
... Backups.backupdb entries repeated for every TM session ...
Perhaps you're confusing this with a .Spotlight-V100 directory within each TM sparse bundle for networked backups. But there is ONLY one.

By the way - lest you think that I'm being critical or pedantic about this - I'm just VERY HAPPY that SuperDuper handles cloning TM disks at all... NOTHING else out there can even touch them except a block based cloner... and for that support I am EXTREMELY thankful...

-- Marc

Last edited by MacCetera; 09-03-2009 at 05:53 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-03-2009, 05:51 PM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,923
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
Quite possibly... I don't remember the details exactly, since I did this research almost two years ago...
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Interrupted backup: Stil valid Smart Update possible? Enc General 0 11-01-2007 03:38 PM
Spotlight Privacy tab refuses to recognize SuperDuper Smart Update -- 100% repeatable RFMoya General 4 09-22-2007 01:46 PM
Slow smart update of very large file - feature request? dtb General 1 07-27-2007 05:46 PM
Smart Update Question gbjerry General 1 06-24-2006 07:43 AM
Smart Update Vs Copy Newer etb General 4 06-06-2006 10:48 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.