 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14
06-22-2005, 04:12 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes, a backup should be placed on its own partition if you're using "Smart Update" or "Erase, then copy". What I'm saying is that there's no reason to subsequently update the user files, rather than the "whole" backup: it won't save you any time, really...
But, you an have important, non-backup files on a *drive*. Just not on the same *partition* if you're using Smart Update or Erase, then copy.
__________________
--Dave Nanian 
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SuperDuper Backup of AES 128 Encrypted Disk Image | rwg4 | General | 3 | 11-30-2005 10:28 AM |
| HELP..>Can't find backup ! | cl2222 | General | 3 | 06-16-2005 08:46 AM |
| Superduper fails to backup since tiger | jeroenimo | General | 1 | 05-17-2005 09:35 AM |
| Smart Backup Error | bill s | General | 20 | 02-04-2005 09:46 AM |
| Kernal Panic | Luhmann | General | 4 | 01-26-2005 10:37 AM |
Threaded Mode