![]() |
|||||||||||
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
My question really is, if Time machine can back up my 180G with 180G, why does it take SD another 180G to back it up and be bootable. Is this normal? I am asking not criticizing.
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| backup file size—SD vs. Time Machine | jotaro | General | 10 | 06-23-2009 10:00 AM |
| Time Machine to an existing SD backup volume? | scutchen | General | 1 | 02-22-2008 02:26 PM |
| Time Machine stopped working - SuperDuper involved? | adriansmith | General | 18 | 02-20-2008 03:48 PM |
| Time Machine Behavior | nkhester | General | 0 | 02-15-2008 03:53 PM |
| A different angle on SD & Time Machine integration | badlydrawnboy | General | 10 | 10-26-2007 08:37 PM |