 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6
10-15-2007, 08:27 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Other people leaking does not allow me to leak, though, Felix.
The post I wrote a year ago, though, is still quite accurate. The two products work well side-by-side, with one focusing on rapid recovery and one on "temporal" backups...
__________________
--Dave Nanian 
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Future of SuperDuper? (in light of Leopard Time Machine) | backerupper3160 | General | 10 | 10-20-2007 10:18 PM |
| A SuperDuper Back Up Strategy | Bagelturf | General | 3 | 09-09-2007 01:23 PM |
| Why is SuperDuper not running at scheduled time? | Chris_Porter | General | 18 | 07-15-2007 03:33 AM |
| Leopard Time Machine vs. SuperDuper | MMM | General | 5 | 07-05-2007 05:20 PM |
| write problems after cloning machine | mkrueger | General | 13 | 12-31-2004 07:17 PM |
Threaded Mode