 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
09-19-2007, 04:51 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well, it's important to note that the whole reason we use a sparse image here, and not a proprietary format, is that it isn't "lock-in" -- it's a totally native OSX format, and not specific to SuperDuper! in any way.
If you want your data to be reachable, though, and your Linux install doesn't support this standard OSX image type, then perhaps you should back up directly to an HFS+ drive. I believe most Linux installs can mount those drives...
__________________
--Dave Nanian 
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Can't select sparseimage as source! | mirkwood | General | 14 | 06-14-2010 06:03 PM |
| SD does not erase sparseimage | patrickmast | General | 9 | 09-02-2007 09:54 AM |
| Sparseimage access question | jesswin | General | 2 | 05-06-2007 05:48 PM |
| Problem with sparseimage backup: LOSS OF DATA | germ | General | 3 | 06-19-2006 09:27 PM |
| Update only a specific folder in a sparseimage ? | Wanda | General | 9 | 01-29-2006 09:26 PM |
Threaded Mode