![]() |
|||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Time Machine Behavior
I have 2 external FireWire drives. One serves exclusively as Time Machine. The other is divided into two equal partitions: one contains a full SD! backup; the other contains an SD! Sandbox.
Normally I would expect that the Time Machine would perform its scheduled updates only from Macintosh HD. This morning I noticed long activity by Time Machine while booted from the Sandbox. Later when I rebooted from Macintosh HD, I found that Time Machine had essentially doubled in size! Does Time Machine attempt to backup from attached peripherals? I have assumed "no" --- but I may be wrong! But, something peculiar was going on with Time Machine when I was surfing from the Sandbox... I've subsequently rebooted from the Sandbox and did not notice any strange Time Machine behavior (because a second "full" backup was achieved on my last visit?). Does anyone have any idea what may have happened --- or, any suggestion for prudent action on my part? MY system configuration is: Computer Model: iMac 24/2.8/2GB/500GB/SD Operating System: Mac OS X (10.5.2) Other Info: HP C7280, WD MyBook x 2, SuperDuper!, APC RS1500 nkhester |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
backup file size—SD vs. Time Machine | jotaro | General | 10 | 06-23-2009 11:00 AM |
Time Machine stopped working - SuperDuper involved? | adriansmith | General | 18 | 02-20-2008 04:48 PM |
SD 2.5, Intego AV X5, and Time Machine. | mrfearless47 | General | 4 | 02-07-2008 10:30 PM |
Will Time Machine make SuperDuper obsolete? | JAC II | General | 9 | 11-07-2007 04:54 PM |
A different angle on SD & Time Machine integration | badlydrawnboy | General | 10 | 10-26-2007 09:37 PM |