![]() |
|||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I have not complained once about how long this is going to take, but please don't give out information that you don't know about. The developer is the one who should tell us when it is coming out. Not a user. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
backup file size—SD vs. Time Machine | jotaro | General | 10 | 06-23-2009 11:00 AM |
Will Time Machine make SuperDuper obsolete? | JAC II | General | 9 | 11-07-2007 04:54 PM |
A different angle on SD & Time Machine integration | badlydrawnboy | General | 10 | 10-26-2007 09:37 PM |
Future of SuperDuper? (in light of Leopard Time Machine) | backerupper3160 | General | 10 | 10-20-2007 11:18 PM |
Leopard Time Machine vs. SuperDuper | MMM | General | 5 | 07-05-2007 06:20 PM |