#1
|
|||
|
|||
Sandbox performance
Dave,
Don't know if you can answer this question but thought I'd give it a shot anyways. I've got a G5 tower with a 74 GB Raptor in sandbox configuration and a 400 GB "original drive". I used the "shared users" script to set-up the sandbox - not for safety/isolation concerns, but because I thought I read somewhere that editing digital images in Photoshop (something I do frequently) is faster when the image files are stored on a different drive than the one PS is running on. However, I also know that the more free space that is available on a boot drive, the faster it will be. So if I rebuilt my sandbox with "shared users & applications", there would be much more space on the drive. (Right now it's about 40% full, with all of my apps on it). I'm just wondering if you can provide any insight here on how the sandbox configuration affects performance. Thanks. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sandbox not recognized anymore... | Al Taylor | General | 1 | 05-30-2007 04:31 PM |
Restoring from Sandbox? | Eric_J | General | 5 | 05-26-2007 09:21 PM |
Sandbox partition too small | joules | General | 3 | 08-11-2006 05:27 PM |
Updating Sandbox | DaleMeyn | General | 5 | 02-28-2006 08:20 AM |
Mac and Backup newbie, sizing sandbox and sparce image | kswaty | General | 5 | 02-14-2006 12:52 PM |