Shirt Pocket Discussions  
    Home netTunes launchTunes SuperDuper! Buy Now Support Discussions About Shirt Pocket    

Go Back   Shirt Pocket Discussions > SuperDuper! > General
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-22-2009, 08:05 PM
jaked.902 jaked.902 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 3
fastest clone?

Looking for some advice for the quickest possible backup scenario:

I provide mac support, and prefer to clone every and any drive before I work on it. I have many external drives, usb / IEEE 1394 a/b, ide and sata, and have recently acquired an esata capable drive - the WD myBook Studio 2. My intention purchasing this drive was to decrease the amount of time spent on a call backing up before getting down to business. Many times the client is not interested in waiting for this process to complete, and it has become awkward on several occasions when the cloning process has failed after significant (lengthy) progress.

So, I tested this WD drive on all four of it's connections - usb, fw400, fw800 and esata, with the drive configured to raid 0. I cloned a G4 emac hooked up in target mode through a 2.6 Ghz MacBook pro with a 7200 rpm hitachi drive inside to the WD mybook. What has surprised me is that fw800 is faster than esata writing to this drive. The fastest read/write speed I have seen via activity monitor is 40 MB/s, which is pretty much what I get to my LaCie d2 (not raid 0) via fw800.

So I'm wondering if anyone can tell me where the bottleneck might be occurring, or is this the limitation of the drives, and any advice on the fastest way to clone a drive without removing it form the machine, with portable gear.

Thanks!

Jake
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-22-2009, 08:10 PM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,923
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
In general, copy a lot of small files doesn't max out most interfaces. I'm a bit surprised that FW800 outperforms eSATA -- I would expect them to be about the same... but, the vagaries of the implementations on both sides are probably responsible for the differences: certainly FW800 has been around longer.
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-26-2009, 09:22 PM
fishmonkey fishmonkey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 28
i haven't used Carbon Copy Cloner for a while, but it would be worth testing it to see if you can get a significantly faster clone using block-level copying...

as far as i am aware, SuperDuper! always does file-level clones...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-03-2009, 07:05 PM
harryb2448 harryb2448 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Nambucca Heads AU
Posts: 12
Something even more surprising.

FW400 backs up system and all files faster than eSATA. Smart Backup takes 11 minutes on FW400, 17 minutes using an eSATA drive.

I wonder why?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-03-2009, 08:16 PM
fishmonkey fishmonkey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 28
what kind of test did you do?

did you back up two identical source volumes onto two identical copies of the destination volume?

Last edited by fishmonkey; 07-03-2009 at 08:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Windows equivalent to SuperDuper!? jreffner General 21 08-13-2009 05:36 PM
fastest method to create the first clone... fishmonkey General 1 01-17-2009 08:53 AM
Using Disk Utility from Clone gets -9972 error (falsely?) eagseags General 6 09-08-2007 09:50 PM
How important is the volume name of the clone? sdsl General 1 09-03-2007 10:05 AM
Problem getting apps to run on clone volume ChetA General 3 09-06-2005 02:19 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.