 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8
02-19-2008, 12:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well ... I didn't initially suspect SuperDuper! but now it's looking more likely that it's the culprit.
If I look at the files that are causing trouble in e.g. the 2008-02-15-095136 directory on each of my TM drives they are not identical. So either SD! did not successfully clone it, or something (TM?) messed it up later. For example, in the original TM backup I have ... drwxr-xr-x@ 3 ray admin 102 Nov 27 23:26 Firefox.app ... in the new one, cloned by SD!, I have ... -r--r--r--@ 57837 3895334 wheel 0 Oct 27 23:58 Firefox.app I've run SuperDuper a few times since ... would the log for that TM clone it did still be around somewhere? Last edited by rdzman; 02-19-2008 at 12:14 PM. Reason: forgot to proofread, left garbage at end of post 
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SuperDuper and Leopard if not using Time Machine | edesignuk | General | 3 | 02-03-2008 06:41 AM |
| Will Time Machine make SuperDuper obsolete? | JAC II | General | 9 | 11-07-2007 03:54 PM |
| A different angle on SD & Time Machine integration | badlydrawnboy | General | 10 | 10-26-2007 08:37 PM |
| How will SuperDuper! integrate with Time Machine? | Felix | General | 15 | 10-23-2007 03:55 PM |
| Leopard Time Machine vs. SuperDuper | MMM | General | 5 | 07-05-2007 05:20 PM |
Threaded Mode