Shirt Pocket Discussions  
    Home netTunes launchTunes SuperDuper! Buy Now Support Discussions About Shirt Pocket    

Go Back   Shirt Pocket Discussions > SuperDuper! > General
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-21-2007, 07:01 PM
diskinserted diskinserted is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2
Unmountable Sparse Image

I recently made a sparse image of my old MacBook and stored it on my husbands iMac G5. It was roughly a 60GB file. We recently purchased a new Mac Mini and planned on cloning the disk image to the mini. When I double clicked the image, SD! told me that the image is unmountable. When getting info on it now it tells me that the image is now only 44MB and not the initial 60GB.

Is there ANY hope of retrieving any of that data?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-22-2007, 09:24 AM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,923
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
It sounds to me like that file was physically damaged between when you made the copy and you looked at it. Do you still have the G5 around?

You can *try* to repair the image with Disk Utility by dragging it into DU's sidebar, selecting it and using the Disk First Aid tab. But given that it seems to have been truncated by 16GB, it's not likely to work...
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-22-2007, 10:25 AM
diskinserted diskinserted is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2
It doesn't make any sense to me

It didn't go down by 16 GB. It went from 60GB to 44 MB! The G5 was showing it as a 60 GB file until the minute I tried to move it over to the mini, at which point it gave me the unmountable message. Immediately after that, I got info on the dmg file, and it had it as 44 MB. I just don't see how the HD could suddenly see a drop of 59.9 GB. Should I assume that the file was corrupt from the get-go? I just don't see how it could be taking up so much real estate, then go to such a small size, almost instantly. I will try the DU repair and see what happens.

Is there any way, for future reference, that I can periodically check on a dmg file and make sure that everything is cool? If this is indeed lost, this is a BIG loss. I'd like to try to avoid it in the future. Would running something like Data Rescue work? I've avoided restarting the machine in the hopes that something could be salvaged. Why would it appear to have made that back-up only to have created a file bloated with nothing? Is there anything that can be done? DU showed

"Verify and Repair disk “disk2s2”
Checking HFS Plus volume.
Invalid B-tree node size
Volume check failed."

Last edited by diskinserted; 10-22-2007 at 10:36 AM. Reason: added info
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-22-2007, 12:00 PM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,923
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
Sorry, I mis-read 44MB as 44GB. Definitely sounds like teh image was physically damaged -- I don't see how it could happen either.

No, I wouldn't suggest it was corrupt from the get-go, since you had already looked at it being correct, no?

What I'd suggest is writing your backup directly to a drive, rather than to an image. That way, you can simply look at the files, and you won't have the (typically unnecessary) "indirection" involved with an image.

Since I don't know how a 60GB file could get whacked to a 44MB file, it's hard to know whether Data Rescue can help. But you can try...
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-24-2007, 02:17 AM
TMay TMay is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 118
Inserted...

A question. As Dave asked, I think, is the original machine still available to you (the MacBook?) Obviously, the data has been erased or you wouldn't be sweating the DI, but... If the machine is still in your hands, and if you haven't overwritten the data on the disk, you might have better luck running some data recovery utility there than running it against the damaged disk image file. Just a thought.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
sparse image creep revisited jotaro General 3 09-20-2007 08:20 PM
Ever-Growing Sparse Image File... Marco_Polo General 6 02-19-2007 10:21 AM
Testing a sparse image... macmidiguy General 5 05-14-2006 01:51 PM
not ejecting sparse image after backup rossb General 7 02-08-2006 05:20 PM
Sparse image from aborted DMG backup? Winston General 9 10-22-2005 12:28 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.