#3
|
|||
|
|||
Hmmm... sort of.
So if I want the clones to be bootable, then they should live on their own partition? Ideally, I do want each of the clones to be bootable, so that I can always revert to them in case of a system failure. Same for my girlfriend's system, and of course, the clean "rescue" system install. But you're right, I don't want to waste drive space by partitioning too much. These sparse images sound like data backups, but not bootable backups. I guess as long as the "rescue" system is bootable, and can repair any potential issues that may arise, I guess all I'd need is to backup my data in order to be able to restore it after repairing. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Does SD! have to reside on its own partition? | Emerson | General | 1 | 05-27-2005 09:36 AM |
Partition an external hard drive problem | andrew_aes | General | 1 | 05-25-2005 07:45 AM |
Can't Boot from External Partition | Goldie | General | 12 | 05-06-2005 08:58 AM |
Backing up a partition to disk image unmounts that partition | kbradnam | General | 8 | 02-17-2005 07:42 PM |
How small can i make sandbox partition | Dutchray | General | 1 | 11-27-2004 07:33 AM |