 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12
02-19-2008, 03:44 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
If there are no errors during the copy the log isn't going to provide much color.
I'm really not sure what to suggest. I've run and compared a large number of these, with multi-multi-million file copies without any changes at all to the file structure or ownership. It's kind of weird that you'd have a different experience. Do you have a way to re-copy to see if the same file has an error if you do it again? Do two copies, back to back (with no TM activity - TM off) end up copying "no" files as it should?
__________________
--Dave Nanian 
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SuperDuper and Leopard if not using Time Machine | edesignuk | General | 3 | 02-03-2008 06:41 AM |
| Will Time Machine make SuperDuper obsolete? | JAC II | General | 9 | 11-07-2007 03:54 PM |
| A different angle on SD & Time Machine integration | badlydrawnboy | General | 10 | 10-26-2007 08:37 PM |
| How will SuperDuper! integrate with Time Machine? | Felix | General | 15 | 10-23-2007 03:55 PM |
| Leopard Time Machine vs. SuperDuper | MMM | General | 5 | 07-05-2007 05:20 PM |
Threaded Mode