 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5
08-21-2006, 02:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thank goodness SD will stick around
Dave:
Understand about the non-disclosure stuff. However, I am more than technically curious about Time Machine having to have a dedicated hard drive, or at least a very large partition ... if it's going to keep around various versions of every Word document back to the days of when 10.5 was first loaded, or whatever -- that could be years. If that is a valid technical assessment, and especially if you are commited to keep SD around, why would you ever need Time Machine data for more than a week or so (assuming you smart update a .dmg every week). John Love 
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A SuperDuper Back Up Strategy | Bagelturf | General | 3 | 09-09-2007 01:23 PM |
| Hotkey Control of Remote machine? | thom | General | 8 | 03-03-2007 10:50 AM |
| write problems after cloning machine | mkrueger | General | 13 | 12-31-2004 07:17 PM |
| 1st backup clone to ext dr estimated time ?? | esuebrown | General | 3 | 07-24-2004 04:31 PM |
| Can I get more than 30 minutes of evaluation time? | dnanian | Frequently Asked Questions | 0 | 07-15-2004 11:40 AM |
Threaded Mode