#7
|
|||
|
|||
Maybe SD could propose -as an option- to remove some of the oldest TM backups as TM does, to get the required space to finish it's own backup? (don't know if this is easy to do, and if Dave considers SD to be allowed to interfere with TM though)
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
backup file size—SD vs. Time Machine | jotaro | General | 10 | 06-23-2009 10:00 AM |
Cannot Read SuperDuper! Image from Tiger in Leopard | ecornips | General | 2 | 12-11-2007 09:50 PM |
Will Time Machine make SuperDuper obsolete? | JAC II | General | 9 | 11-07-2007 03:54 PM |
A different angle on SD & Time Machine integration | badlydrawnboy | General | 10 | 10-26-2007 08:37 PM |
write problems after cloning machine | mkrueger | General | 13 | 12-31-2004 07:17 PM |