 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
09-20-2005, 01:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
SuperDuper vs Tiger - slower backups?
Since upgrading to Tiger from Panther, my bu time for cloning my HD has increased from 8+ minutes to over 17 minutes. The last 3 backups have been around 17:30. Other than Tiger, there has been no significant addition to the system. Also, I am not indexing my external HD via Spotlight.
Wondering if anyone else has experienced similar?
__________________
2017 iMac 40 gb RAM; 2TB Fusion SSD (10.14.6) MacBook Pro 15" 2.3ghz i7/ 16 gb RAM; 500GB SSD (11.1) Western Digital My Passport Slim 1TB, USB 3.0 for MBP Envoy Pro EX SSD - Thunderbolt 3 for iMac Last edited by 2stepbay; 09-20-2005 at 01:12 PM. Reason: clarification 
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SuperDuper Backup of AES 128 Encrypted Disk Image | rwg4 | General | 3 | 11-30-2005 11:28 AM |
| Upgrading a safety clone to tiger | 00afro | General | 12 | 07-09-2005 12:53 PM |
| Superduper fails to backup since tiger | jeroenimo | General | 1 | 05-17-2005 10:35 AM |
| OSX Tiger and SuperDuper! | brich | General | 17 | 04-26-2005 10:20 PM |
| SuperDuper automounts disk images used for previous backups | kbradnam | General | 1 | 03-11-2005 08:56 PM |
Threaded Mode