Shirt Pocket Discussions  
    Home netTunes launchTunes SuperDuper! Buy Now Support Discussions About Shirt Pocket    

Go Back   Shirt Pocket Discussions > SuperDuper! > General
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 12-30-2006, 10:43 AM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,923
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
I agree with you, trevyn. But disks shouldn't fail either, and they do. When a system isn't performing properly - whether due to memory issues, disk failure, controller failures, etc - we can only work with what we have... and if an error isn't flagged, or is ignored, it's difficult to know what to do.

I've never seen anything similar to what you've experienced here, and as I've said I do thousands of tests. But if your system is corrupting data -- for whatever reason -- we'll be a victim of that corruption just like any other application might be.

Memory on a non-MacPro isn't ECC and doesn't have parity, so memory errors will not be caught by the system. And, if a drive fails to write but does not flag an error to us, there's no way for us to know, unless we were to checksum every source and destination file during every copy: something that would be prohibitively slow, expensive, would cause additional wear-and-tear, etc. And even that can't guarantee everything'll always work right (plus, an active system is always changing, so you'll have errors each and every time you ran).

We've worked very hard at this end to only use well-tested functions that leverage as much of Apple's work (and OSX) as possible. And, in our testing, these functions have been reliable. Where we've caught errors (such as missing metadata) we've made extensive efforts to supplement those calls (and this has been verified by third parties who have found us to be the most accurate copying engine). But we've never seen them mis-copy existing data, even once, in all our testing.

I'll do my best to try to reproduce the problem... but as I've said I've never seen anything like it before, so I'm not hopeful.
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SuperDuper Failing on Backup - I/O Errors Stephen Kuhn General 1 08-13-2006 04:03 PM
Original OS & Backup won't boot (HUGE fan noise) super8trash General 9 02-26-2006 11:56 AM
How to verify a Scheduled Backup? tuqqer General 3 12-06-2005 06:50 PM
Why is my backup smaller than the original HD? uelef General 22 08-07-2005 06:48 PM
Backup und Original not identical? jfahrner General 6 08-02-2005 01:40 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.