![]() |
|||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Why Time Machine if You Have SuperDuper
Why would I want to use TimeMachine when I have SuperDuper? In comparison, TM seems redundant, and takes extra time and resources to manage.
![]() What am I missing? Thanks. |
Tags |
time machine |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Time Machine Copy | jerrykrinock | General | 1 | 04-02-2010 02:36 PM |
Needed: Time Machine and SuperDuper guidance | kapalama | General | 7 | 08-13-2009 08:55 AM |
Using SuperDuper for an offsite Time Machine backup | toy | General | 1 | 07-26-2008 01:02 PM |
Time Machine stopped working - SuperDuper involved? | adriansmith | General | 18 | 02-20-2008 04:48 PM |
Will Time Machine make SuperDuper obsolete? | JAC II | General | 9 | 11-07-2007 04:54 PM |