#8
|
|||
|
|||
As it turns out (and as I learned via some experimentation since I didn't know how to answer your big question), your better response might have been something like "Don't worry about it -- the SD! and TM backups will co-exist just fine without any partitioning necessary."
I guess there is actually no reason for concern, at least until the entire 1.5TB drive is filled; and then TM will start deleting its oldest versions. But what will SD! do if there's not enough space to complete a smart update at that time? Thanks again! |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Backup failure on a certain file | bmat | General | 3 | 09-25-2007 09:06 AM |
Too Big Backup Sparseimage File?! | parabel | General | 4 | 12-28-2006 07:52 AM |
Backup fails because of not enough room on destination sparseimage file??? | tubwreck | General | 6 | 03-24-2006 10:10 AM |
(Zero-length) File caused SuperDuper to abort backup | alancfrancis | General | 7 | 08-31-2005 10:42 AM |
File Preventing Successful Backup | michael k | General | 4 | 03-18-2005 10:02 AM |