|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Well, I think the first thing I'd try, after a full backup with SD!, of course, is an upgrade install. You can do the clean install if you have trouble with the upgrade, eh?
__________________
--Dave Nanian |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Of course - thanks, C
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Paranoid upgrade to Leopard -- advice/verification please
Paranoid user with Power Mac G4/933 about to upgrade to Leopard.
Four HDs, 2 int and 2 ext. int HD 1 - 120 GB
int HD 2 - 250 GB
ext HD 1 - 500 GB
ext HD 2 - 500 GB
Gratuitous emoticon. Quote:
"Usage Tip" on p38 of the manual talks about keeping new application images and installers in a folder on the desktop in the Sandbox. Since it's shared with the original volume, you can restart under the original volume, and then apply those installers to the original volume. You seem to say, then, that one should try an upgrade install of Leopard on the original volume (after backing it up!). Correct? If that doesn't work, one can wipe and reinstall Leopard clean, and using migration assistant to transfer files from the backup. You seem to say that Sandbox won't work between different system versions: therefore, if I upgrade my base Macintosh HD partition above to Leopard, my three Sandbox Tiger partitions will stop working, correct? Now the first BIG questions: when I use SuperDuper! to create Leopard Sandboxes, can I simply Smart Update, or will it be necessary to Erase the existing Sandbox partitions? I think I would only lose installed apps on a Sandbox, if I used the "Erase" option in SuperDuper! Sandbox, so the impact wouldn't be too bad. Or is there something else that would get lost? Finally the second BIG question: suppose I erase the two 30 GB partitions containing Sandbox 0 and Sandbox 1. Suppose I clean install Leopard on Sandbox 0, and then use migration assistant, taking care to create aliases to the ext HD 1 with Documents folders so the 30 GB doesn't fill up. Suppose I then create a Leopard Sandbox on the Sandbox 1 partition. Now I would have partitions with Tiger, Tiger Sandbox, and also Leopard, Leopard Sandbox. Would this work? Is it advisable? Or is there a better plan? Maybe you could mention the steps you at Shirt Pocket are taking? All of the above presumes the use of the updated version of SuperDuper! after Leopard arrives. I'm presuming you don't suggest trying the existing version for either Smart Updates or Sandboxes? __________________ --Suman |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
That's right: do NOT use a Sandbox for Tiger -> Leopard updates.
What I always do is back up and try an upgrade. If there's a problem, it's easy enough to clean install/migrate or restore and wait for the next version. You will likely be able to Smart Update an existing Sandbox, but erasing won't hurt, since it's smaller than a full backup anyway (and likely to copy nearly everything again)... Linking Documents probably would work -- but don't try to share too much of your Home folder, especially between different major OS versions.
__________________
--Dave Nanian |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
My setup is pretty simple with just one external hard drive dedicated to a SuperDuper clone of my Mac hard drive.
Assuming I just can't wait to install Leopard (!) could I check your recommended procedure? As I understand it, Leopard will detect my external drive and offer to use it for Time Machine. Since I want to continue to use SD, presumably I should say no and wait for the Leopard compatible version of SD? Or should I use Time Machine for now and reallocate the external drive to SD when the new version is available? I'm assuming I can't use the one drive for both? Thanks. Nick Last edited by NickRich; 10-26-2007 at 10:28 AM. Reason: Adding name at end |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
You can partition your external drive into two volumes, one for Time Machine and one for SuperDuper. Or, you can get a new drive for Time Machine (since it really likes extra space -- given its intended use, the more the better.
__________________
--Dave Nanian |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for the quick reply Dave. My present external drive is getting pretty full, so a new drive seems the best option.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
ANSWER: Back Up, Upgrade main volume, then recreate orphaned Sandbox(es)
Quote:
My Sandboxes will be orphaned until I recreate them: I will recreate a single Sandbox using erase instead of Smart Update, as you suggest. I will do this using the *current* version of SD 2.1.4, even though it's only partially compatible. I will treat it as a beta test, and see how it does. The key answers seem to be to BACK UP your main system volume, and then upgrade its OS version, realizing that you will orphan any Sandboxes based on that main system volume. Then, you recreate the Sandboxes -- because of a major system change, Smart Update won't buy you much time savings, probably, so using the erase option is indicated. Will do. If I find anything as a "tester" I will post it. P.S. I link Documents mostly for iTunes. That has the lions share of storage (near 200 GB now). I link the "iTunes Music" folder inside the iTunes folder. That leaves all the settings files within the home folder. I also follow the "Kinkless Desktop" by putting all my own documents in an Archive folder, leaving the actually Documents folder alone for "Microsoft User Data" and other such application detritus. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
STATUS: Sandbox created, but rebooting is hung up; should you clone your Sandbox too?
Quote:
Note 2: Then I ran SD 2.1.4 to erase/create a Sandbox in a 30 GB partition. I set it to reboot from that Sandbox, but it's spent 15 minutes at the grey apple logo screen with the circle of rotating pills. YMMV, but it seems Dave wasn't kidding when he said the current version of SD is not fully compatible. I'll do a hard power down and then see if it boots (maybe I'll even zap the PRAM). Question: Say you have 3 partitions: Sandbox, Main System, and Data. The user folder in the Main System partition has aliases to Documents folder in Data partition. Currently, I emphasize backing up Data, figuring I can always reinstall system software. But ideally, should you have a backup drive which has matching partitions and back up each using SD? Dave, do you (Shirt Pocket) clone your main system and all Sandbox partitions regularly? If so, would you mind saying if you do it weekly or daily or whatever your scheme is? Anyone else clone their Sandbox and Main System partitions? __________________ --Suman (all hail Dave Nanian) |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
I never clone the Sandbox: I only back up my partitions that I can't recreate easily (a Sandbox, being based on a main partition, isn't backed up).
And, no, I wasn't kidding about Leopard compatibility. The data's all there, but the metadata isn't perfect due to changes in Leopard...
__________________
--Dave Nanian |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
10.5 Leopard - yes or no? | DaleMeyn | General | 8 | 10-26-2007 10:43 AM |
Future of SuperDuper? (in light of Leopard Time Machine) | backerupper3160 | General | 10 | 10-20-2007 10:18 PM |
Starting off fresh with Leopard | bdahm | General | 1 | 09-30-2007 05:37 PM |
Leopard Time Machine vs. SuperDuper | MMM | General | 5 | 07-05-2007 05:20 PM |
Setup Leopard & Tiger to use same home folder | lonewolf2222 | General | 5 | 09-02-2006 09:56 AM |