Shirt Pocket Discussions  
    Home netTunes launchTunes SuperDuper! Buy Now Support Discussions About Shirt Pocket    

Go Back   Shirt Pocket Discussions > SuperDuper! > General

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-27-2016, 11:18 AM
MichaelD MichaelD is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 10
Comparing Two SD Sparse images

I (try) to do a daily backup to sparse images which I cycle through. I noticed one day one image was 90GB smaller and I became concerned. I know what happened: Sierra's System Preference->iCloud->iCloud Drive -> Options checked Optimize Mac Storage.

My question is how can one compare the sparse images to see which files are missing. A launched a couple of instance of Terminal, mounted the images, changed the directories of each instance of Terminal to a mounted image. I then did sudo du -sh */ and ls -lh on each image in each instance. Both were identical from the information reported. The images were 690GB and 780GB.

Shouldn't I have seen the difference or am I clueless?

How can I figure out the differences between two images?

Thanks,
Michael
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-27-2016, 12:45 PM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,923
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
The external image file size isn't really relevant. Is the internal drive size significantly different?
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-28-2016, 06:16 AM
garoomph garoomph is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by dnanian View Post
Is the internal drive size significantly different?
No, he wrote as much.

I too want to compare whole volumes. Acutely a Time Machine restore vs an older SuperDuper clone. But also to verify backups.

I've used rsync --dry-run, but it's a pain to exclude all the stuff that breaks it, like /Volumes and /dev.

VisualDiffer is on the App Store, but doesn't cover all metadata and has problems with permissions.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-28-2016, 07:21 AM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,923
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
Well, it wasn't entirely clear, even though he did a "du". But in his case, external size difference isn't relevant.

With millions of files on a typical copy, and the fact that you're copying from a live drive in most cases, "verifying" the backup is always going to find many mismatches and doesn't really help a lot...
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-28-2016, 04:53 PM
garoomph garoomph is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29
Well, if there's a mismatch in the Documents folder, or some folder completely missing (because I messed up excludes), I want to know.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-29-2016, 10:16 AM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,923
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
I think I'd generally recommend not being overly selective in your copies, for sure, that way you can't mess up the excludes. But, my general philosophy is that trying to put verification in the same code that does the copy means that while you can catch things like copy errors (that would be caught anyway, since we stop on errors), you can't catch "algorithmic error" - that is, if we have somehow made a mistake, we're going to make the same mistake in our "check" (since the "check" is, in essence, the same as the check-to-copy).

So, using another product, written by a whole different team/company, helps to ensure you're really "checking".

You'll note I also encourage people to use multiple products to back up, and multiple devices. Again: my primary focus is to try to get people to back up. It's a big reason SuperDuper's free version doesn't expire, and why I provide the same support to our free users (and there are a lot of them) that I do to our paid users.

Hope that makes some sense.
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
sparse images, sparse bundle images, and encryption nephdoc General 3 01-20-2010 03:04 PM
Booting off sparse images? techno General 1 02-05-2009 10:13 AM
Sparse images: only use smart backup? edoates General 7 08-15-2005 01:17 PM
Sparse Images under Jaguar SpinUp General 1 12-05-2004 07:48 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.