Shirt Pocket Discussions  
    Home netTunes launchTunes SuperDuper! Buy Now Support Discussions About Shirt Pocket    

Go Back   Shirt Pocket Discussions > SuperDuper! > General

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-01-2005, 02:28 PM
mortenosx mortenosx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 22
Different space left on the original and target ?

I have posted this before, and thanks for your feedback. But i still dont get it.

233 gb = left 74,74 gb
backup disk 233 gb = left 69,75 gb

Why is are there not the same space left on my master and target drives, i have restarted and deleted the trash !!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-01-2005, 02:32 PM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,745
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
Does one have Journaling on and one not?
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-01-2005, 02:48 PM
mortenosx mortenosx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 22
Journaled

They are both extended (journaled)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-01-2005, 02:52 PM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,745
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
I don't know, Morten. We're copying the files that are there, as files. Why they'd be taking more or less space has to do with the way the OS is storing them. But we're not skipping them, or parts of them, nor are we adding to them...
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-02-2005, 09:51 PM
macfeller macfeller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 49
Is the difference ...

virtual memory?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-02-2005, 09:54 PM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,745
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
I'd expect that to go the other way, macfeller -- you'd end up with less space on the source than the destination, not the other way around.
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-02-2005, 09:55 PM
TMay TMay is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 118
Morten

Just a thought (because it has happened to me, tho' not having to do with S/D.) Are you sure both drives really ARE 233 gb, or are they both called that or 250 or some such? I ask because right now, I have three supposed 60 gig drives, from three manufacturers, all formatted the same by the same OS, and they are all different, ranging from a formatted low of 53.7 gigs to a formatted high of 57.8. Disk Utility will tell you what they actually are. (And if they actually both ARE 233, then i'm sorry to have wasted your time.)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-03-2005, 10:17 AM
mortenosx mortenosx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 22
One disk is 233,64 gb
and one is 233,62 gb
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.