![]() |
|||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I support a workplaces with various Mac models and I have to frequently re-prep machines as they go in and out of circulation. However, some of the computers are having performance problems and I' m wondering if there's a better way.
For instance, I create a system, with all the software installs, on a 1.8 GHz G5, clone it onto the external HD [with SuperDuper], and I use this as the master build for all other G5 models [including dual 2.0 and 2.5 GHz's]. Is it better to make a build for each model G5 [1.8 GHz, dual 2.5 GHz, etc.,] or should I make one generic G5 build for all models? ![]() Last edited by flux1968; 08-25-2005 at 01:41 PM. Reason: Not enough detail |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Safety Clone or Clone | na goodman | General | 3 | 08-10-2005 07:14 AM |
Booting with Safety Clone? | dgboat | General | 5 | 07-14-2005 12:12 PM |
Upgrading a safety clone to tiger | 00afro | General | 12 | 07-09-2005 11:53 AM |
Safety clone usage | camner | General | 3 | 05-17-2005 12:03 AM |
Applying system update to safety clone | na goodman | General | 3 | 02-20-2005 03:41 PM |