#1
|
|||
|
|||
Cloning time difference
1- Cloning my Internal HD with CCC is Soooo much faster than doing an identical copy with SuperDuper.
AND, 2- The final copy is much smaller 45GB (with SD) as opposed to 50GB (with CCC) which is closer to the actual size of my internal Drive. Can anyone enlighten me on these 2 discrepancy? Thank you |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Needed: Time Machine and SuperDuper guidance | kapalama | General | 7 | 08-13-2009 07:55 AM |
"Unable to create hard link" error when cloning Time Machine drive | Moussaka | General | 5 | 07-15-2009 03:53 PM |
Cloning my Time Machine HD before repairing it | Ward | General | 1 | 12-06-2008 08:07 AM |
Cloning from a backup and Time Machine Weirdness | isaac | General | 3 | 03-27-2008 01:09 PM |
Cloning a Time Machine Volume | barrysharp | General | 5 | 10-30-2007 11:58 PM |