#16
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks mac-10,
Sorry the screen shots did not show up here. Indeed my dest volume does have a Time Machine backup on it: But yet my "what is going to happen" screen does not say anything about Time Machine. I checked "About SupeDuper!" and indeed its says "Version 2.5 (v84)". The top level ls -a -l listing of my destination drive (since screen shots didnt work) is below and you can see the presence of Backups.Backupdb macbook [BookBak] %3 ls -al total 24 drwxrwxr-x 11 bammi bammi 442 Jan 29 23:33 ./ drwxrwxrwt@ 6 root admin 204 Feb 7 00:00 ../ -r-------- 1 bammi bammi 16 Jan 28 23:21 .0017f229c25e -rw-rw-r--@ 1 bammi bammi 6148 Jan 29 23:33 .DS_Store drwx------ 3 bammi bammi 102 Jan 28 22:45 .Spotlight-V100/ d-wx-wx-wt 3 bammi bammi 102 Feb 5 21:16 .Trashes/ -rw-r--r-- 1 bammi bammi 0 Jan 28 22:45 .com.apple.timemachine.supported drwx------ 67 bammi bammi 2278 Feb 7 00:15 .fseventsd/ drwxr-xr-x+ 3 root bammi 102 Jan 28 23:24 Backups.backupdb/ ________ vapor genie vaporizer Last edited by bammi; 01-20-2011 at 08:46 PM. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
backup file size—SD vs. Time Machine | jotaro | General | 10 | 06-23-2009 10:00 AM |
SuperDuper and Leopard if not using Time Machine | edesignuk | General | 3 | 02-03-2008 06:41 AM |
Will Time Machine make SuperDuper obsolete? | JAC II | General | 9 | 11-07-2007 03:54 PM |
A different angle on SD & Time Machine integration | badlydrawnboy | General | 10 | 10-26-2007 08:37 PM |
How will SuperDuper! integrate with Time Machine? | Felix | General | 15 | 10-23-2007 03:55 PM |