Shirt Pocket Discussions  
    Home netTunes launchTunes SuperDuper! Buy Now Support Discussions About Shirt Pocket    

Go Back   Shirt Pocket Discussions > SuperDuper! > General

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-28-2006, 12:39 AM
backerupper3160 backerupper3160 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 16
Question Future of SuperDuper? (in light of Leopard Time Machine)

I can't help wondering, what is the future of SuperDuper in light of the "Time Machine" feature in the next feature of the Mac OS (10.5, "Leopard").

Admittedly it's not due out till next spring, but does anyone (who knows somewhat what they're talking about) have any predictions? (will SD become redundant in other words?)

Not trying to be a doomsayer, just looking ahead.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-28-2006, 08:39 AM
hukalaki hukalaki is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3
By my understanding Time Machine is an incremental backup utility, non-bootable. Might be great, but I want a clone of my machine, updated daily. SD does that (as well as incremental), and is bootable to boot.

so I think it's two different audiences. TM for folks who never backup, and SD for those who value being able to go right back to work.

Nonetheless TM may make folks stop looking at good 3rd party solutions--let's hope not.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-28-2006, 12:18 PM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,354
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
Hi, backerupper3160. I wrote a post about this at Shirt Pocket Watch, so take a look.
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-28-2006, 01:42 PM
backerupper3160 backerupper3160 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by dnanian View Post
Hi, backerupper3160. I wrote a post about this at Shirt Pocket Watch, so take a look.
Thanks that was helpful.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-01-2006, 05:46 PM
trevyn trevyn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 10
Incidentally, this:

Quote:
...we’re not angry, and Apple has no obligation to leave market opportunities for independent developers, notify us that things are coming, or pretty much anything else.
made me buy my SD license. It's refreshing to see a developer not get angry at Apple in the face of competition.

I was out of town for WWDC this year, so I'm not up on the NDA specifics, but what I'd ideally like to see is Time Machine doing transparent versioning with the free space on the boot drive, and SD making periodic images to a network volume, just like it does now.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-01-2006, 06:16 PM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,354
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
We'll all have to wait and see what TM does when it actually gets released!
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-02-2006, 02:56 AM
denke denke is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 17
Dave,

I agree with what you said on your blog. When I first read about Time Machine, I thought it would be the perfect complement to SD - well, more precisely, I thought it exactly the complement I want to SD.

Btw, that Taiko is handsome! May you have many happy years together!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-02-2006, 09:52 AM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,354
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
Thanks, denke -- he's at my feet being rather rambunctious right now!
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-02-2006, 04:05 PM
davecc davecc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 37
I don't think Dave has anything to worry about with TimeMachine. If TimeMachine is anything like Spotlight, SuperDuper will have a long life. I have used SuperDuper for quite some time and never had any issues with it. Why Change a proven backup method with your very valuable data?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-20-2007, 07:38 PM
naftalim naftalim is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4
I have read the blog article about the complementary role that SD plays with Time Machine. My question is, how does this work physically? Do I have 2 partitions, (or 2 drives) one where SD backs up, and one where Time Machine does its thing? I don't see them working off the same backup device?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-20-2007, 11:18 PM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,354
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
You'd have two drives or two partitions, yes. You can share a single partition with an image, but I think it's much more convenient to have a separate, bootable partition.
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A SuperDuper Back Up Strategy Bagelturf General 3 09-09-2007 02:23 PM
Time Machine fdwlaw General 7 08-28-2006 01:44 PM
A word of praise for SuperDuper! MMM General 3 06-21-2006 11:08 PM
write problems after cloning machine mkrueger General 13 12-31-2004 08:17 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.