Shirt Pocket Discussions  
    Home netTunes launchTunes SuperDuper! Buy Now Support Discussions About Shirt Pocket    

Go Back   Shirt Pocket Discussions > SuperDuper! > General

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-26-2009, 02:26 PM
Kalkas Kalkas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 19
Unhappy Restoring from sparsebundle / sparseimage

I have noticed that it takes too much time to restore a disk from a sparsebundle or sparseimage. I have backed up about 95 GB content of my harddisk, and it takes two hours to restore it using Disk Utility.

Is this normal?

On the other hand, restoring from a dmg-image, takes about 15 min. However, the process of creating such image takes 5 hours! It is better to create a sparsebundle because it takes very little time when doing second time.

I find it very frustrating that restoring takes so much time.

Kalkas
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-26-2009, 04:01 PM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,357
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
Well, in general, Read-Only images spend a lot of time up front ensuring that the image can be written quickly, at a low level, during restore... whereas a read/write image/bundle does a file-by-file copy which takes a longer time. Not much can be done about this, but since you restore rarely and back up frequently, I'd generally advise using a read/write image and paying the rare time price at restore time.
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-27-2009, 01:45 PM
Kalkas Kalkas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 19
Thanks for your advice. I use dmg (read only) images only for critical and important backups, such as the backup image of the drive right after installation of a new operating system, or right after an important and critical upgrade.

I understand that it takes so much time of creating/restoring images because my drive is quite large.

Kind regards,
Alex
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-27-2009, 02:17 PM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,357
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
A read-only image isn't really "better" for critical or important backups: you can always lock the image...
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Can't select sparseimage as source! mirkwood General 14 06-14-2010 07:03 PM
Restoring from sparseimage file on NAS drive jackhm General 3 02-25-2008 12:36 PM
how can multiple users mount to a sparseimage at the same time? roeligan General 3 01-16-2008 12:08 PM
SD does not erase sparseimage patrickmast General 9 09-02-2007 10:54 AM
Sparseimage access question jesswin General 2 05-06-2007 06:48 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.