Shirt Pocket Discussions  
    Home netTunes launchTunes SuperDuper! Buy Now Support Discussions About Shirt Pocket    

Go Back   Shirt Pocket Discussions > SuperDuper! > General

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-19-2009, 10:23 AM
kennbrodhagen kennbrodhagen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3
Time Machine running 5X faster than SuperDuper

I recently purchased a Buffalo LinkStation NAS for backups and performed a Time Machine backup then a backup using SuperDuper.

The Time Machine backup completed in about 10-12 hours. The SuperDuper backup is now on hour 45 and is reporting about 85% complete.

Can anyone suggest why the SuperDuper backup is running so much slower than the Time Machine?

Here are some of my system statistics:
Mac OSX 10.5.7
Backing up 300 GB of used space on a 1 TB HDD
NAS is connected over gigabit ethernet
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-19-2009, 11:51 AM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,342
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
It's not typical that TM would be faster, but perhaps your LinkStation NAS (which is generally pretty slow) doesn't handle large files (the image) well? Time Machine uses "sparse bundles", which manage a large number of small file "bands" in a package, rather than a "sparse image", which uses a single large file...
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-19-2009, 04:59 PM
kennbrodhagen kennbrodhagen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3
I notice that after more than 50 hours now all of the files are still not "evaluated". Is it possible that it's the evaluation that's slowing it down and not the raw copy speed?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-19-2009, 06:35 PM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,342
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
No, evaluation and copying are the same - it's a single pass copy.
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-19-2009, 06:43 PM
kennbrodhagen kennbrodhagen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3
The entire backup has now finished and reports an overall transfer rate of 1.66 MB/s.
I did a test with an 11.45 GB file and copied it to the NAS through Finder and got an overall speed of 6.5 MB/s. I can also hear the NAS drives working a lot more when I do a finder copy than when SD is running.

I checked the log and it doesn't appear to have any errors or warnings. It seems to log during the inital start of the backup and at the end when it closes out but not during file copy process itself.

Is there a way to set the logging to a debug level?

Is it possible that SD moves the file pointer around in the sparse image file a lot as it copies each file, like to update an index or something?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-19-2009, 06:46 PM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,342
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
How the "file pointer" moves is entirely up to the system, as you might expect. We copy the entire file with a single low-level call, and then supplement the metadata as appropriate (which can take a few). Subsequent Smart Updates will be faster...
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
slow, superduper, time machine, timemachine


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Super Slow Time Machine After SuperDuper Restore kipshaw General 5 07-12-2009 03:45 PM
Using SuperDuper for an offsite Time Machine backup toy General 1 07-26-2008 01:02 PM
SuperDuper causing Time Machine to fail jrdub General 2 02-26-2008 11:22 PM
Time Machine stopped working - SuperDuper involved? adriansmith General 18 02-20-2008 04:48 PM
Will Time Machine make SuperDuper obsolete? JAC II General 9 11-07-2007 04:54 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.