|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Technical differences between SD! and CCC
I have been a faithful user of SD for many years and will do so again when SD becomes Leopard compatible.
However, in the meantime I have been using CCC ... gotta do something in the meantime, or I would cease to be responsible. So ... under the cover, what are the major technical differences in the approaches taken by SD and CCC. ... and, has anyone successfully used CCC to restore? Thanks for listening. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
backup file size—SD vs. Time Machine | jotaro | General | 10 | 06-23-2009 10:00 AM |
Will Time Machine make SuperDuper obsolete? | JAC II | General | 9 | 11-07-2007 03:54 PM |
A different angle on SD & Time Machine integration | badlydrawnboy | General | 10 | 10-26-2007 08:37 PM |
Future of SuperDuper? (in light of Leopard Time Machine) | backerupper3160 | General | 10 | 10-20-2007 10:18 PM |
Leopard Time Machine vs. SuperDuper | MMM | General | 5 | 07-05-2007 05:20 PM |