|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Will Time Machine interfere with SuperDuper?
Is it a problem if Time Machine runs while SD! is backing up?
This is on my wife's Intel iMac, OS X 10.5.1 and SD! 2.5 (84). Time Machine backs up to one Firewire drive and SD! backs up to another. Btw, how's Taiko? |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Shouldn't be a problem (unless you're copying Time Machine itself, in which case you should turn it off while copying it).
Taiko's doing great, thanks: he's at my feet now, itching to go for another walk...
__________________
--Dave Nanian |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New user: Which one first -- SuperDuper or Time Machine | david.paige | General | 3 | 02-24-2008 03:38 AM |
Time Machine stopped working - SuperDuper involved? | adriansmith | General | 18 | 02-20-2008 03:48 PM |
SuperDuper and Leopard if not using Time Machine | edesignuk | General | 3 | 02-03-2008 06:41 AM |
Will Time Machine make SuperDuper obsolete? | JAC II | General | 9 | 11-07-2007 03:54 PM |
A different angle on SD & Time Machine integration | badlydrawnboy | General | 10 | 10-26-2007 08:37 PM |