Please don't laugh . . . . .

[lugesm]

I have used SuperDuper on my iMac since a Leopard version was available. Love it.

My wife has a Mac-Mini, and I downloaded the "free" version to her machine, and it works well there.

Question: Do I have to buy two (2) licenses for two machines, or can I use my first machine license on my wife's Mac?

I asked you not to laugh . . . . . . .

[dnanian]

You need another license: your wife is a different person...

[Timmy]

Actually, it's not a stupid question at all.
The license agreement (that displays when we mount the SD! disk image) does not seem to mention anything about the number of machines or users which a SD! license applies to.

Here is an interesting scenario:
My mom has an iBook which I maintain for her. I do all of the software updating and backing-up, etc. She never actually uses SD! herself because I perform her backups manually every few weeks.
Since I have my own license to SD! for my system, theoretically I could claim that my license apples to my use of SD! on her system...

(I haven't done that. She has her own registration for SD!.)

[dnanian]

If you'd prefer, Timmy, we could write a really obnoxious license agreement that is super restrictive, rather than relying on our customers' sense of fairness and trying to be flexible...

[Timmy]

It could be obnoxious and restrictive.
Or it could be obnoxious and un-restrictive.
But could it be restrictive without being obnoxious?

[beanie]

Originally Posted by Timmy

It could be obnoxious and restrictive.
Or it could be obnoxious and un-restrictive.
But could it be restrictive without being obnoxious?

How about you have to wear a t-shirt with a pocket if you want to be able to make backup copies of your drive. Huh, huh ?