View Single Post
  #1  
Old 07-19-2009, 10:23 AM
kennbrodhagen kennbrodhagen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3
Time Machine running 5X faster than SuperDuper

I recently purchased a Buffalo LinkStation NAS for backups and performed a Time Machine backup then a backup using SuperDuper.

The Time Machine backup completed in about 10-12 hours. The SuperDuper backup is now on hour 45 and is reporting about 85% complete.

Can anyone suggest why the SuperDuper backup is running so much slower than the Time Machine?

Here are some of my system statistics:
Mac OSX 10.5.7
Backing up 300 GB of used space on a 1 TB HDD
NAS is connected over gigabit ethernet
Reply With Quote