Thread: SD Vs CCC
View Single Post
Old 02-25-2009, 12:45 AM
invictus26 invictus26 is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 10
I just wanted to say that I bought SD because it seemed to be more stable and feature rich. Unfortunately, I haven't been able to get SD to make reliable clones to my server despite days of trying. I gave CCC a shot, and it has worked perfectly every time, even cloning to sparseimages that SD was never able to mount. I would say that CCC is much better for networked backups, so if that's something you might do, you should look at CCC.
Reply With Quote