Shirt Pocket Discussions  
    Home netTunes launchTunes SuperDuper! Buy Now Support Discussions About Shirt Pocket    

Go Back   Shirt Pocket Discussions > SuperDuper! > General

 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 07-19-2009, 09:23 AM
kennbrodhagen kennbrodhagen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3
Time Machine running 5X faster than SuperDuper

I recently purchased a Buffalo LinkStation NAS for backups and performed a Time Machine backup then a backup using SuperDuper.

The Time Machine backup completed in about 10-12 hours. The SuperDuper backup is now on hour 45 and is reporting about 85% complete.

Can anyone suggest why the SuperDuper backup is running so much slower than the Time Machine?

Here are some of my system statistics:
Mac OSX 10.5.7
Backing up 300 GB of used space on a 1 TB HDD
NAS is connected over gigabit ethernet
Reply With Quote
 

Tags
slow, superduper, time machine, timemachine


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Super Slow Time Machine After SuperDuper Restore kipshaw General 5 07-12-2009 02:45 PM
Using SuperDuper for an offsite Time Machine backup toy General 1 07-26-2008 12:02 PM
SuperDuper causing Time Machine to fail jrdub General 2 02-26-2008 10:22 PM
Time Machine stopped working - SuperDuper involved? adriansmith General 18 02-20-2008 03:48 PM
Will Time Machine make SuperDuper obsolete? JAC II General 9 11-07-2007 03:54 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.