#1
|
|||
|
|||
SuperDuper Superiority to Restore?
Running OSX 10.4.11, I'm wondering about the difference between SD!s backup it produces as opposed to the Restore option in Disk Utility. In SD, i just use the simple erase and copy method, rather than a smart update or the like. Also, I'm making my bootable backup out of a sparse image, that way i have no need to partition my external hard drive while utilizing maximum space. Can Restore handle this operation?
I have no intentions of getting rid of SuperDuper because it is such a great program with a simple UI. I just want to add this little nugget to my mac knowledge. Thanks! |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New to Mac and to SuperDuper - Need a little help | MikeG | General | 15 | 02-14-2008 10:35 PM |
A word of praise for SuperDuper! | MMM | General | 3 | 06-21-2006 10:08 PM |
SuperDuper used to restore after new hard drive install | dmetzcher | General | 2 | 04-18-2006 12:21 AM |
After 10.4.4 SuperDuper Stopped Recognizing Target Drive | bobcarr@mac.com | General | 1 | 01-12-2006 03:01 AM |
SuperDuper Backup of AES 128 Encrypted Disk Image | rwg4 | General | 3 | 11-30-2005 10:28 AM |