#6
|
||||
|
||||
1. On a slow device (not necessarily a slow *network*, but a slow device), that's not unusual, although not great.
2. Your device -- or network, it's hard to tell -- is running very slowly if things took that long. We can only run as quickly as your device and network let us run. 3. Those are compatibility warnings because the scripting dictionary is compatible all the way back to Jaguar. I'm sorry that you don't like the fact that I'm pointing out some device slowness given the way things are accessed. If you want to check, it's easy enough to try a similar backup on a local, properly formatted drive and see if it runs as quickly as you'd expect. If it does, the difference is the device and/or network. As far as "Norton Backups" go - it's a different system, with a different filesystem, different network stacks, accessing the drive in different ways. They can't really be compared.
__________________
--Dave Nanian |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Smart update not working in Leopard? | Ordfabriken | General | 8 | 12-03-2007 10:28 PM |
Interrupted backup: Stil valid Smart Update possible? | Enc | General | 0 | 11-01-2007 03:38 PM |
Spotlight Privacy tab refuses to recognize SuperDuper Smart Update -- 100% repeatable | RFMoya | General | 4 | 09-22-2007 01:46 PM |
Smart Update Question | gbjerry | General | 1 | 06-24-2006 07:43 AM |
Smart Update Vs Copy Newer | etb | General | 4 | 06-06-2006 10:48 PM |