Shirt Pocket Discussions  
    Home netTunes launchTunes SuperDuper! Buy Now Support Discussions About Shirt Pocket    

Go Back   Shirt Pocket Discussions > SuperDuper! > General

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-09-2006, 12:49 PM
loosegroove loosegroove is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 21
Unexpected Results using Smart Update

Using SD 2.1.2 (v79) to backup to external firewire drive.

I have 3 scheduled backups set up (daily, weekly, monthly). All 3 have the same settings: Backup - user files using Smart Update. Based on my understanding of Smart Update, it basically makes an exact duplicate of what you are backing up by adding/deleting those files that changed since the last backup.

I manually ran each backup and I got unexpected results. The "daily" image is 30.17 GB. Both the "weekly" and "monthly" images are 22.55 GB. I would expect all 3 to be the exact sme size given that I am using Smart Update.

What am I missing?

--
Bronson
__________________
17" 1.83 GHz Intel iMac | 2GB RAM | 160GB HD | Mac OS X 10.5.6
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-09-2006, 08:31 PM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,923
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
Are you looking at the external size of the file?
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-09-2006, 09:26 PM
loosegroove loosegroove is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 21
I'm doing a Get Info on the actual disk image that SD creates.

--
Bronson
__________________
17" 1.83 GHz Intel iMac | 2GB RAM | 160GB HD | Mac OS X 10.5.6
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-09-2006, 09:32 PM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,923
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
If they're all Smart Updates, and the files aren't changing in between the runs, they should be the same size (internally), yes...
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-09-2006, 09:40 PM
loosegroove loosegroove is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 21
OK, I mounted each image and the internal size of all 3 is 22.55 GB.

Now that I know each image is identical, why is there a difference in the disk image sizes? I'm not too familiar with the disk image format and how it sizes the images.

FYI - all three are sparse images.

--
Bronson
__________________
17" 1.83 GHz Intel iMac | 2GB RAM | 160GB HD | Mac OS X 10.5.6
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-09-2006, 09:55 PM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,923
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
Image files grow, but rarely shrink. So, depending on the pattern of the update, they could end up being different external sizes. But the internal size should be the same, as it is.
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Smart Update Question gbjerry General 1 06-24-2006 07:43 AM
Smart Update in Reverse? jaydisc General 1 06-09-2006 09:28 AM
Smart Update Vs Copy Newer etb General 4 06-06-2006 10:48 PM
smart update didn't work due to remaining space problems JohnCoffee General 1 05-08-2005 09:42 AM
Smart Update Deletes Rest of Volume? Pixx General 12 04-26-2005 10:04 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.