#2
|
||||
|
||||
Let me try to answer:
1. Yes, it's the full backup that was present before conversion. 2. Yes. 3. No, it can't without processing all the files first. Since you'd have to pay that cost for every backup, rather than just the occasional out-of-space failure, it didn't seem to be worth the penalty. (It's also not a guarantee, because the drive can change during processing...) 4. At present, there's no way to place the two parts of the image process on different drives. But, it's unlikely to be significantly faster... we do have some tricks up our sleeves in v2.0, though, that should speed things up.
__________________
--Dave Nanian |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SuperDuper Backup of AES 128 Encrypted Disk Image | rwg4 | General | 3 | 11-30-2005 10:28 AM |
Storing Disk Images on CD? | MMM | General | 14 | 10-24-2005 07:53 PM |
Sparse images: only use smart backup? | edoates | General | 7 | 08-15-2005 01:17 PM |
Sparse image mounted over network is grayed out in backup destination list | therevolution | General | 5 | 06-25-2005 07:49 PM |
Backup to Sparse Image on Linux Box Through Network | sukhjeet | General | 1 | 12-31-2004 08:08 PM |