Shirt Pocket Discussions  
    Home netTunes launchTunes SuperDuper! Buy Now Support Discussions About Shirt Pocket    

Go Back   Shirt Pocket Discussions > SuperDuper! > General

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-04-2006, 11:14 AM
andyb andyb is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1
back-up clone much smaller than original, One reason maybe...

Hi, My back-up clone is also much smaller than original (71Gb for the original, 31Gb for the back-up clone) and I have noticed other posts to this effect. Thanks to comments by the administrator I think I have found one possible reason and would appreciate feedback as whether it makes sense or not and other implications.

I did do 2 back-ups, in between optimizing the original and following about every single Unix maintenance procedure that is recommended. Always the same result in both cases.

Following the advice of the administrator dnanian as to what files are ignored by SuperDuper when making a back-up, I turned all folders & files visible using Cocktail and went snooping in /tmp, /private/var/vm and /volumes. In /volumes I found aliases for all my volumes with the exception of a real folder for my old back-up external drive which was using the Apple Backup program from the .Mac service and found a whole collection of incremental back-up by Apple Backup files totaling about 30Gb. It looks like that's the problem.

- Why would Apple stick those files there if I am backing up to an external drive?
- Can safely delete all these files? They are the incremental back-up files of the apple back-up program (kind: Incremental back-up package).
- Can I delete the whole folder in /volumes with the name of my old back-up external drive in one go?
- At this point I have 2 clones of my harddisk done with SuperDuper so I should be safe moving forward and I am somewhat miffed of what Apple did here. Any reason/benefit to keep using Apple backup instead of ditching and going entirely with SuperDuper.

Thanks for letting me know

PS: I like simplicity/clarity and so far Apple didn't give it to me
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-04-2006, 11:47 AM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,293
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
It's an easy mistake to make. If your external drive fails in weird ways, the OS never tells the application, which will continue to copy to the old "Mount point".

A "mount point" is a special kind of folder that represents an external drive. But, if it converts into a "real" folder, it's hard to tell -- and applications keep copying, as Backup did.

It's safe to delete the files, though you might have to reset Apple Backup, if you want to keep using it.

Hope that helps!
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A SuperDuper Back Up Strategy Bagelturf General 3 09-09-2007 01:23 PM
Clone size smaller than source johnm General 7 04-13-2006 11:13 AM
Smart Update from the Clone back to my internal HD fdwlaw General 1 09-05-2005 10:06 AM
Smart Update from the Clone back to my internal HD fdwlaw General 0 09-05-2005 07:52 AM
Installations Pete_Bull General 7 04-14-2004 05:12 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.