#5
|
|||
|
|||
Very cool. That makes things a lot simpler!
I have a Sandbox, a Hard Drive, a Time Machine drive, and another drive for bootable clones of the Hard Drive. I can continue along as I'm doing it now, except I'll have the added benefit of Time Machine too. That said, since I've gotten in the habit of backing up nightly, I don't imagine Time Machine will be that big of a deal for me. Maybe I won't even use it. Thanks Dave for your prompt replies (as always). I assume we'll get an email from you when SD is ready for 10.5? |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
backup file size—SD vs. Time Machine | jotaro | General | 10 | 06-23-2009 10:00 AM |
How will SuperDuper! integrate with Time Machine? | Felix | General | 15 | 10-23-2007 03:55 PM |
Future of SuperDuper? (in light of Leopard Time Machine) | backerupper3160 | General | 10 | 10-20-2007 10:18 PM |
Leopard Time Machine vs. SuperDuper | MMM | General | 5 | 07-05-2007 05:20 PM |
write problems after cloning machine | mkrueger | General | 13 | 12-31-2004 07:17 PM |