Shirt Pocket Discussions  
    Home netTunes launchTunes SuperDuper! Buy Now Support Discussions About Shirt Pocket    

Go Back   Shirt Pocket Discussions > SuperDuper! > General

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-06-2009, 07:04 AM
kipshaw kipshaw is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 3
Super Slow Time Machine After SuperDuper Restore

Hi -

Re:
Mac OSX 10.5.6
iMac

I have an external LaCie 500 MB Firewire Drive that I've split into two partitions (using Disk Utility). One partition is for Time Machine, the other for SuperDuper, which I purchased Sunday April 5 and used for the first time.

Here's what I did:

I ran Time Machine to the TM partition. Worked fine.

Ran SuperDuper to SD partition. Worked fine.

After a bit of computer work and a couple more automatic TM backups, I ran SuperDuper again, this time using Smart Update. Worked fine.

Then I booted up from the SD partition, did a few simple things to make some changes.

Then, I ran the SD app located on the partition and did a Restore (Smart Update) to the internal MacHD.

Restarted and booted up normally from the MacHD. Worked fine. SD's restore worked fine.

But ...

The next time TM ran, it virtually choked - long "prep" time, then backup speed was snail speed - measured in KB, really bytes, per second.

So slow that I stopped TM, erased its partition on the external and started over again. Then, it behaved normally.

Question:

How do I prevent this from happening again?

Thanks!

- Kip
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-06-2009, 07:47 AM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,292
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
As I indicated in my emailed reply, Kip, we don't do anything that might cause Time Machine to have slow copy performance... we just copy files.
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-06-2009, 08:30 AM
kipshaw kipshaw is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 3
Hi Dave -

OK. Thanks for the quick reply.

I just thought that TM might have been confused by the restored files - that is, yes, SuperDuper! only "copied" when it restored, but the copies somehow looked different to TM, hence the slowdown.

- Kip
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-06-2009, 08:37 AM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,292
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
That might cause it to copy more, Kip, but not slower.
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-06-2009, 08:50 AM
kipshaw kipshaw is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 3
Strange TM behavior, but not a disastrous. So I shouldn't really complain. Just thought I'd add my experience to the pile, just in case someone knows what I or TM did wrong.

Thanks!

- Kip
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-12-2009, 02:45 PM
sgmiller sgmiller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 28
Same Experience

I am having the same experience after an SD restore. TM had so far taken 5 hours to copy 13 gb.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
time machine


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Restore from Super Duper and Time machine? noahd1 General 1 03-23-2009 08:02 AM
Using SuperDuper for an offsite Time Machine backup toy General 1 07-26-2008 12:02 PM
SuperDuper: restore from Time Machine? kingvald General 5 07-09-2008 08:09 AM
Time Machine stopped working - SuperDuper involved? adriansmith General 18 02-20-2008 03:48 PM
Will Time Machine make SuperDuper obsolete? JAC II General 9 11-07-2007 03:54 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.