Shirt Pocket Discussions  
    Home netTunes launchTunes SuperDuper! Buy Now Support Discussions About Shirt Pocket    

Go Back   Shirt Pocket Discussions > SuperDuper! > General

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-21-2007, 02:19 PM
jotaro jotaro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 6
backup file size—SD vs. Time Machine

Here's another issue concerning backup, it seems to me:

SuperDuper duplicates what I am backing up, which means the backup file on the external hard drive will be about the same size as on my hard drive.

Time Machine, however, keeps adding to the backup hard drive. Let's say I made edits every day to a 2 GB movie file. Time Machine adds another 2 GB file to the backup disk every time I make an edit. If this is correct, the back up gets huge fast, far exceeding the size of my hard drive, which is 250 GB. Does this mean I should think about buying an external drive for Time Machine backup that is 3 or 4 times the size of my hard drive?? Does Time Machine recognize limits of back up disk and automatically lop off oldest files to make room for new ones?

jotaro
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-21-2007, 03:12 PM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,290
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
I'm sure Time Machine will "throw away" older copies of things to keep your data to the drive size. Realize, though, that the more space you give Time Machine, the more useful its style of copying will be.
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-22-2007, 02:26 AM
jotaro jotaro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 6
Well, yes, a giant hard drive would be ideal…at least hard drives are getting cheaper all the time. I think I saw a 1TB external hard drive for around $350. That ought to do the trick…for about 6 months.

jotaro
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-09-2008, 08:26 AM
Alex Alex is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 9
OK, so now that SD 2.5 is out (yeah, cool, great! thanks) and can share a partition with time machine, what about the issue of having the TM size increasing everyday?
A time will come when SD won't have enough room left to do it's own backup.

Or would SD be able to remove the oldest TM backups as TM itself does?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-09-2008, 08:55 AM
Alex Alex is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 9
Oh, I just saw the question as already been raised on this topic.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-03-2009, 04:31 PM
Papa Art Papa Art is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 17
Another question

What might be the suggested partitions to set up on a 1.5TB external drive for use with both Time Machine and SuperDuper? (My internal hard drive is 1TB but with less than 200GB actually in use at this time.) Thank you!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-03-2009, 04:33 PM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,290
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
The big question is how large do you expect your internal to get? Data does tend to expand to fill the space you've got...
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-23-2009, 02:33 AM
Papa Art Papa Art is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 17
As it turns out (and as I learned via some experimentation since I didn't know how to answer your big question), your better response might have been something like "Don't worry about it -- the SD! and TM backups will co-exist just fine without any partitioning necessary."

I guess there is actually no reason for concern, at least until the entire 1.5TB drive is filled; and then TM will start deleting its oldest versions. But what will SD! do if there's not enough space to complete a smart update at that time? Thanks again!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-23-2009, 07:09 AM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,290
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
It will fail, as I explain in the FAQ: you're better off using separate partitions if you can.
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-23-2009, 09:56 AM
Papa Art Papa Art is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 17
Understood; it's just that I have no idea as to how to predict how large the data on the internal 1TB will eventually become. It seems as though either method (coexistence or partitioning) could require starting all over again at some point in the future.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Backup failure on a certain file bmat General 3 09-25-2007 09:06 AM
Too Big Backup Sparseimage File?! parabel General 4 12-28-2006 07:52 AM
Backup fails because of not enough room on destination sparseimage file??? tubwreck General 6 03-24-2006 10:10 AM
(Zero-length) File caused SuperDuper to abort backup alancfrancis General 7 08-31-2005 10:42 AM
File Preventing Successful Backup michael k General 4 03-18-2005 10:02 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.